Guy A. Matteson, Iii v. Ryder System Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arbitrator stepped outside his authority when he decided an issue that had been focused on earlier in a grievance process but not in the final hearing
• reversing arbitral decision “[b]ecause the [arbitral tribunal] exceeded its authority as arbitrator by deciding issues not submitted to it by the [parties]”
• reversing arbitral decision \[b]ecause the [arbitral tribunal] exceeded its authority as arbitrator by deciding issues not submitted to it by the [parties]\
• reversing arbitral decision \[b]e- cause the [arbitral tribunal] exceeded its authority as arbitra- tor by deciding issues not submitted to it by the [parties]\
• noting “the congressional policy of promoting speedy, efficient, and inexpensive resolution of labor grievances”
• “[T]here is no doubt that our review of the interpretation of a submission is highly deferential.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).