· 4/28/1989
Gutman v. Giordano
Citations
- 557 A.2d 782
- 384 Pa. Super. 78
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1086
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that order was “without prejudice” even though order did not explicitly include those words, where trial court did not treat it as “with prejudice”
- Lamp requirement satisfied where plaintiff followed correct procedure in obtaining writ and made good-faith service attempts at defendant's place of employment
- “when an action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute a claim, . . . it is not an adjudication on the merits”
- Lamp requirement satisfied where plaintiff followed correct procedure in obtaining writ and made good-faith service attempts at defendant’s place of employment
- non pros judgment for failure to answer a trial listing is not an adjudication on the merits and may not form the basis for application of res judicata
- “[A] non pros for failure to answer a trial listing is not an adjudication on the merits and thus may not form the basis for application of res judicata.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanaugh, McEwen, Popovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.