Banker v. Valley Forge Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the insurance policy provision is clear and unambiguous, the insurer does not have a duty to explain all of the hypothetical consequences which might result from an excess coverage endorsement
• “ ‘Law of the case ... means that whatever is once irrevocably established as the controlling legal rule of decision between the same parties in the same case continues to be the law of the case----’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).