Gupta v. Ritter Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that implied warranty is \implicit in the contract between the builder/vendor and original purchaser\
• holding that implied warranty is “implicit in the contract between the builder/vendor and original purchaser”
• stating that the implied warranty that a building constructed for residential use has been constructed in a workmanlike manner covers “latent defects not discoverable by a reasonably prudent inspection of the building at the time of sale”
• stating that the implied warranty that a building constructed for residential use has been constructed in a workmanlike manner covers “latent defects not discoverable by a reasonably prudent inspection of the building at the time of sale”
• foundation settled excessively causing walls to crack, roof to leak, and patio to pull away from house
• foundation settled excessively causing walls to crack, roof to leak, and patio to pull away from house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Gupta v. Ritter Homes, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Gupta v. Ritter Homes, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-04-15· cited 17×