Gumma v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the State was a party at both proceedings for collateral estoppel purposes where the State participated in both proceedings, once through the State’s Attorney’s office and once through the Secretary of State’s office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gumma v. White
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-07-21· cited 73×
• Franciscan Communities v. Hamer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-08-28· cited 20×
• Walker v. Dart
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-05-22· cited 16×
• Webb v. White
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-04-07· cited 3×
• Jones v. White
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-08-23· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Housing Authority for La Salle County v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-03-23· cited 227×
• Murdy v. Edgar
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-03· cited 156×
• People v. Moore
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-09-26· cited 101×
• Rigney v. Edgar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-07-31· cited 22×
• Berry v. Edgar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-07· cited 13×
• Lehmann v. Department of Children & Family Services
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-09-09· cited 12×
• People v. Flynn
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-04-20· cited 11×
• Schultz v. Edgar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-05-11· cited 7×
• People v. Hackman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-02-14· cited 6×