· 7/21/2005
Gumma v. White
Citations
- 833 N.E.2d 834
- 216 Ill. 2d 23
- 295 Ill. Dec. 628
- 2005 Ill. LEXIS 955
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a requirement of the application of collateral estoppel is that the party against whom estoppel is being asserted was a party, or in privity with a party, in the prior adjudication
- listing the elements of collateral estoppel as: (1) the issue decided in the prior adjudication is identical with the one presented in the suit in question, (2) there was a final judgment on the merits in the prior adjudication, and (3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMORROW
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.