Skip to main content
· 7/21/2005

Gumma v. White

Citations

  • 833 N.E.2d 834
  • 216 Ill. 2d 23
  • 295 Ill. Dec. 628
  • 2005 Ill. LEXIS 955

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a requirement of the application of collateral estoppel is that the party against whom estoppel is being asserted was a party, or in privity with a party, in the prior adjudication
  • listing the elements of collateral estoppel as: (1) the issue decided in the prior adjudication is identical with the one presented in the suit in question, (2) there was a final judgment on the merits in the prior adjudication, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMORROW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.