S.D. New York· 11/4/1983
Gulliver v. Dalsheim
Citations
- 574 F. Supp. 111
- 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11975
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where the court presumed that a New York state court would have allowed a pro se litigant who mislabeled a filing to amend the filing rather than dismiss his claim because of such an error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Whitman Knapp
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Darwin Jay Robinson, Sr. v. Charles J. Black, Warden, Nebraska State PenitentiaryEighth Circuit· 1987-05-05· cited 27×
- Russell G. Smart v. Charles J. Scully, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, and Executive Director, New York State Division of ParoleSecond Circuit· 1986-04-07· cited 19×
- Gulliver v. DalsheimSecond Circuit· 1984-07-18· cited 9×
- Gulliver v. DalsheimS.D. New York· 1984-04-24
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 6,068×
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court· 1982-03-08· cited 5,808×
- Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,714×
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,121×
- Eugene Jerome Joseph Klein v. David Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, Robert Abrams, Attorney GeneralSecond Circuit· 1981-12-15· cited 216×
- Jose B. Martinez v. David R. Harris, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility, and Robert AbramsSecond Circuit· 1982-04-01· cited 103×
- People ex rel. Hall v. LeFevreNew York Court of Appeals· 1983-07-12· cited 18×
- People ex rel. Hall v. LeFevreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-03-03· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.