Guilford v. Love
Citations
- 49 Tex. 715
Syllabus
<p>1. Partial records in probate proceedings.—A .certified copy of proceedings had in the Probate Court in an estate, is admissible, it relevant, so far as it goes. It is not rendered incompetent because not complete, or because other proceedings may control its effect.</p> <p>2. Construction of orders in same administration.—A sale under an order of the Probate Court, of a tract of land, does not convey to the purchaser an interest in the tract inconsistent with an interest therein recognized by the same court in proceedings had in the estate. The probate sale only conveyed the interest of the estate.</p> <p><3. Trespass to try titled—Title.—In such action, plaintiff, on showing title either in severalty or in common with others not joined in the suit, can recover against a mere trespasser.</p> <p>4. Specific performance in Probate Court.—It seems that in proceedings to enforce a written contract for sale against an estate, in the Probate Court, under the Probate act of 1848, it was not necessary that the heirs be made parties, and be cited, as was required in the final partition.</p> <p>5. Same.—Such proceedings have been recognized as valid, in the absence of service on the heirs. (George v. Watson, 19 Tex., 369.)</p> <p>6. Construction of order of Probate Court.—An order in the Probate Court declaring “ that D is entitled to one-half of said league of land,” evidences an adjudication in the court upon the subject; as do the words it “having been shown to the satisfaction of the court ” import a trial.</p> <p>7. A FAILURE TO PERFECT A PARTITION WILL NOT AVOID THE DECREE awarding IT.—After such adjudication, and after a commission to make partition in accordance therewith had made their report, the court ordered that the administrator make de.ed for the half set apart within one month : Held, That the failure of tire administrator to make such deed did not avoid the adjudication as to the extent of the interest. -</p> <p>8. Jurisdiction of Probate Court.—In a case
Judges: Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Fitch v. BoyerTexas Supreme Court· 1879-07-01· cited 75×
- Williams v. BallTexas Supreme Court· 1879-11-05· cited 49×
- Robertson v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court· 1882-05-09· cited 28×
- Pilcher v. KirkTexas Supreme Court· 1881-05-06· cited 24×
- Heard v. VineyardTexas Commission of Appeals· 1919-06-04· cited 24×
- Chrisman v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court· 1879-07-01· cited 20×
- Watkins v. DavisTexas Supreme Court· 1884-04-18· cited 18×
- Louder v. SchluterTexas Supreme Court· 1890-06-10· cited 18×
- Miller v. FosterTexas Supreme Court· 1890-03-11· cited 16×
- Gunter v. FoxTexas Supreme Court· 1879-07-01· cited 15×
- Wright v. DunnTexas Supreme Court· 1889-03-12· cited 15×
- Waterman Lumber & Supply Co. v. RobbinsTexas Commission of Appeals· 1918-12-11· cited 15×
- Gillenwaters v. ScottTexas Supreme Court· 1884-12-19· cited 14×
- Tom v. SayersTexas Supreme Court· 1885-07-01· cited 14×
- Lawson v. MoormanSupreme Court of Virginia· 1889-03-14· cited 13×
- Brockenborough v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court· 1881-12-19· cited 12×
- Baldwin v. Davis Hill Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1951-09-13· cited 11×
- Bowles v. BealTexas Supreme Court· 1883-11-09· cited 8×
- Pelham v. MurrayTexas Supreme Court· 1885-07-01· cited 8×
- Tilge v. United StatesCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1911-05-31· cited 8×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Folger v. Columbian InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1868-03-15· cited 84×
- Kempe's Lessee v. KennedySupreme Court· 1809-02-20· cited 79×
- Green v. RugelyTexas Supreme Court· 1859-07-01· cited 70×
- Parker v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1845-07-15· cited 67×
- Foot v. StevensNew York Supreme Court· 1837-10-15· cited 58×
- Coit v. HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1861-09-15· cited 47×
- Cryer v. AndrewsTexas Supreme Court· 1853-07-01· cited 33×
- Dancy v. StricklingeTexas Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 26×
- Graham v. ViningTexas Supreme Court· 1847-12-15· cited 25×
- Fisk v. NorvelTexas Supreme Court· 1852-07-01· cited 18×
- Rose v. NewmanTexas Supreme Court· 1861-07-01· cited 18×
- Robert v. HollandTexas Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 18×
- Baker v. CoeTexas Supreme Court· 1857-07-01· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. BloodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1867-10-15· cited 15×
- Simmons v. BlanchardTexas Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 14×
- Lightner v. MenzelCalifornia Supreme Court· 1868-07-01· cited 13×
- Bates v. Planters' & Merchants' BankSupreme Court of Alabama· 1838-06-15· cited 11×
- Ottenhouse v. Burleson's Adm'rsTexas Supreme Court· 1853-07-01· cited 9×
- John Tumlinson's Adm'r v. John York's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court· 1858-07-01· cited 9×
- Wardrup v. JonesTexas Supreme Court· 1859-07-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.