Rose v. Newman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing mandamus in which relator asserted that judge who called court of inquiry was \interested in the outcome of the proceeding\ and was accuser in proceeding but was not subject to cross-examination
• addressing mandamus in which relator asserted that judge who called court of inquiry was “interested in the outcome of the proceeding” and was accuser in proceeding but was not subject to cross-examination
• addressing mandamus in which relator asserted that judge who called court of inquiry was “interested in the outcome of the proceeding” and was accuser in proceeding but was not subject to cross-examination
• addressing mandamus in which relator asserted that judge who called court of inquiry was \interested in the outcome of the proceeding\ and was accuser in proceeding but was not subject to cross-examination
• “A court has no jurisdiction to render an opinion on a controversy that is not yet ripe.”
• op. on motion for rehearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).