Gueorgui Krouchevski v. John D. Ashcroft

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a reviewing court should not supersede the IJ’s credibility finding simply because the petitioner’s explanations could support an alternative finding
• holding that where credibility determinations are concerned, a reviewing court should not supersede an agency finding simply because an alternative finding could also be supported; rejecting petitioner’s post hoc interpretations of his testimony
• documents “could corroborate any number of stories; they do not prove that the one Krouchevski told is the truth”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).