Guard v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a parent who went for months at a time without making payments and missed more payments than he made did not “regularly contribute” to his child’s support
• the Supreme Court only addressed the question whether the support requirement violates the Equal Rights Amendment, Wash. Const. art. XXI, § 1, and held that it did

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).