Hanson v. Hutt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that even prior to the passage of the state Equal Rights Amendment, a classification based on sex is inherently suspect
• holding a statute with a classification based on pregnancy is subject to strict scrutiny under the state Privileges and Immunities Clause, Const. art. I, § 12
• holding a statute with a classification based on pregnancy is subject to strict scrutiny under the state Privileges and Immunities Clause, Const, art. I, § 12
• plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment granted
• plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment granted
• superseded by constitutional amendment on other grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).