Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 10/1/2004

Gualandi v. Adams

Citations

  • 385 F.3d 236
  • 2004 WL 2202549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plan that was exclusively funded by school district for its employees was an exempt government plan
  • finding no abuse of discretion where plaintiffs had not demonstrated how discovery was needed to overcome jurisdictional challenge under Rule 12(b)(1)
  • upholding district court’s denial of plaintiffs discovery requests where requested material would not have precluded summary judgment
  • affirming district court’s implicit denial of discovery where plaintiff faded to “demonstrate that additional discovery was needed in order to decide the jurisdictional issue”
  • school district established plan set up by union and insurer by providing exclusive funding for it
  • \we are convinced that Congress aimed for a broad definition of the term `establish'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cardamone, Jacobs, Parker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Gualandi v. Adams

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.