Supreme Court· 6/10/1991
Gollust v. Mendell
Citations
- 501 U.S. 115
- 111 S. Ct. 2173
- 115 L. Ed. 2d 109
- 1991 U.S. LEXIS 3321
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- expressing the Supreme Court’s “reluctan[ce] to exceed a literal, ‘mechanical’ application”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Souter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.