Seventh Circuit· 8/1/2017

Groshek v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.

Citations

865 F.3d 884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that deficient disclosure alone was insufficient injury for standing to sue for violation of statute aimed at protecting individuals' control over their consumer information
holding that deficient disclosure alone was insufficient injury for standing to sue for violation of statute aimed at protecting individuals' control over their consumer information
explaining that “[b]ecause Groshek admits that he signed the disclosure and authorization form, he cannot maintain that he suffered a concrete privacy injury”
finding that defendant’s disclosure form that contained extraneous information did not cause a particular injury to Groshek
finding that plaintiff had not alleged a sufficiently concrete harm based on the inclusion of additional information, including a liability waiver, in the stand-alone disclosure form
noting that “the statute here does not seek to protect Groshek from the kind of harm he claims he has suffered, i.e., receipt of a non-compliant disclosure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Williams, Deguilio

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.