Grimsdale v. Kash N' Karry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was immaterial whether the plaintiff answered the defendants' calls or whether the calls went to voicemail
• holding that for purposes of TCPA liability, it is immaterial whether the calls were answered or went to voicemail
• dismissing Section 1692(f)(1) claim because plaintiffs failed to provide any evidence or case law to support their claim
• declining to limit damages available to plaintiffs at summary judgment stage just because they did not submit medical proof of their emotional distress
• “[E]ven the least sophisticated consumer can be presumed to possess ... a willingness to read a collection notice with some care.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he TCPA clearly restricts the making of any call using an automatic telephone dialing system to a cellular phone[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).