McMorris v. TJX Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding “reasonable 8 probability” that class of “residents of Massachusetts” included at least one member 9 “domiciled in a state other than Massachusetts or Delaware, the two states in which 10 [defendant was] domiciled”
• “[R]esidents of 22 Massachusetts” was insufficiently limiting because “[c]itizenship . . . is equated not with 23 residence, but with ‘domicile[.]’”
• “bare assertion” that two-thirds of putative class members are citizens of Massachusetts insufficient to qualify for CAFA exclusion
• “[T]his putative class 5 that is composed entirely of residents of Massachusetts, does not, by definition, foreclose 6 the inclusion of non-citizens as well. This suffices to support the assertion of federal 7 jurisdiction in this [CAFA] case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).