Idaho Supreme Court· 1/31/2007

Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout Co., Inc.

Citations

152 P.3d 604
143 Idaho 733
61 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 926
2007 Ida. LEXIS 27

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that where a contract is too vague, indefinite, and uncertain as to its essential terms, and not merely ambiguous, there has been no “meeting of the minds” which is necessary for contract formation and courts will “leave the parties as they found them”
“Reasonable certainty requires neither absolute assurance nor mathematical exactitude; rather, the evidence need only be sufficient to remove the existence of damages from the realm of speculation.”
“The burden is upon the plaintiff to prove not only that it was injured, but that its injury was the result of defendant’s breach; both amount and causation must be proven with reasonable certainly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Trout, Eismann, Burdick, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Griffith v. Clear Lakes Trout Co., Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Griffith v. CLEAR LAKES TROUT CO., INC.
Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-01-27· cited 26×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.