Barry v. Pacific West Construction, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding trial court’s finding that there was a meeting of the minds because there was evidence in support
• noting that “[r]evovery under a quantum meruit theory is measured by ‘the reasonable value of the services rendered or goods received.’” (quoting Erickson v. Flynn, 138 Idaho 430, 434-35 (2002)). suffered if the contract had been performed. Id. (quoting Restatement (Second
• affirming recovery to unlicensed public works contractor under unjust enrichment to further public policy interests
• affirming recovery to unlicensed public works contractor under unjust enrichment to further public policy interests
• illegal contract was unenforceable, however, subcontractor was entitled to recover for work performed under a theory of unjust enrichment; subcontractor’s recovery was limited to restitution
• illegal contract was unenforceable, however, subcontractor was entitled to recover for work performed under a theory of unjust enrichment; subcontractor's recovery was limited to restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).