Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 4/25/1989
Griffin v. Griffin
Citations
- 558 A.2d 86
- 384 Pa. Super. 210
- 1989 Pa. Super. LEXIS 1056
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[w]e will not decide moot or abstract questions, or enter a judgment or decree to which effect cannot be given.”
- holding husband’s release from prison upon satisfying his support arrearages did not render issue on appeal moot where husband remained subject to continuing support order under which he could again be subject to contempt proceedings giving rise to same issue
- holding husband’s release from prison upon satisfying his support arrearages did not render issue on appeal moot where husband remained subject to continuing support order under which he could again be subject to contempt proceedings giving rise to same issue
- describing the finality requirements for an appeal from contempt of support proceedings
- rejecting the argument that the appeal from a contempt order in a support case is moot, because the husband remains subject to a continuing support order and a second failure to comply with the order would again subject him to contempt proceedings
- order enforcing child support through attachment proceedings is immediately appealable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brosky, Rowley, McEwen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Diamond v. DiamondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-08-05· cited 42×
- Glynn v. GlynnSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-17· cited 37×
- Foulk v. FoulkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-17· cited 36×
- Warmkessel v. HeffnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-03-10· cited 35×
- McMahon v. McMahonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-20· cited 26×
- Deasy v. DeasySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1999-04-15· cited 19×
- Reif v. ReifSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-06-01· cited 11×
- Grandovic v. GrandovicSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-09-20· cited 10×
- Llaurado, M. v. Garcia-ZapataSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-11-13· cited 10×
- Kulp v. KulpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-03-12· cited 7×
- Llaurado, M. v. Garcia-Zapata, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-11-13· cited 3×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1975-11-26· cited 288×
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-11-20· cited 240×
- Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-01-28· cited 126×
- Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-01· cited 125×
- Ritter v. RitterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-12-05· cited 57×
- Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-29· cited 49×
- Graziano Const. Co., Inc. v. LeeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-04-23· cited 29×
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ermel v. ErmelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-12-30· cited 25×
- Danko Development Corp. v. Econocast Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-11-27· cited 21×
- Koller v. KollerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-09-21· cited 21×
- Kozlowski v. KozlowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-04-22· cited 16×
- Laxton v. LaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-09-13· cited 13×
- O'Brien v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-05· cited 8×
- Shazes v. BaltuskonisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-01-06· cited 6×
- Szwecki v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-01-27· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.