Skip to main content
· 11/27/1987

Danko Development Corp. v. Econocast Corp.

Citations

  • 534 A.2d 1108
  • 369 Pa. Super. 120
  • 1987 Pa. Super. LEXIS 9914

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • order dismissing claim based on implied warranty of habitability was not final, where claims of negligence, breach of contract, and misrepresentation remained
  • order dismissing claim based on implied warranty of habitability was not final, where claims of negligence, breach of contract, and misrepresentation remained
  • an order dismissing claim based on implied warranty of habitability was not final where claims of negligence, breach of contract, and misrepresentation remained
  • an order dismissing claim based on implied warranty of habitability was not final where claims of negligence, breach of contract, and misrepresentation remained
  • appeal quashed where order dismissing one theory of recovery did not put plaintiff out of court on underlying cause of action
  • appeal quashed where order dismissing one theory of recovery did not put plaintiff out of court on underlying cause of action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanaugh, Beck, Montgomery

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.