Skip to main content
· 5/28/1965

Griffen v. Stevenson

Citations

  • 402 P.2d 432
  • 1 Ariz. App. 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • future damages are recoverable where the evidence reflects that surgery is reasonably certain to be performed and where the amount of damages is \established with reasonable certainty\
  • error to instruct on future surgical needs where doctor had seen plaintiff a “few months” before trial and could testify only that “if the patient’s arm still remains in a discomforting and a disabling condition, then I would consent to consider him for a surgical procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donofrio, Stevens, Thurston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.