Skip to main content
D. Arizona· 5/30/2017

Greyhound Lines Inc. v. Viad Corp.

Citations

  • 260 F. Supp. 3d 1181

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Arizona does not 9|| adhere to the view ‘that ambiguity must exist before parol evidence is admissible.’’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.