D. Arizona· 5/30/2017
Greyhound Lines Inc. v. Viad Corp.
Citations
- 260 F. Supp. 3d 1181
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Arizona does not 9|| adhere to the view ‘that ambiguity must exist before parol evidence is admissible.’’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.