Gresser v. Union Pacific Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the FSCSA’s guidance is consistent with the regulation’s language and “entitled to respect”
• holding the regulation’s unambiguous language defining “insured” triggers the. MCS-90 only when there is a judgment against the named insured

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).