Birck v. City of Quincy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a 1f-inch sidewalk defect to be de minimis
• “[t]he stumbling point for most of these cases seems to occur as the defect approaches two inches”; height difference of 1 ⅞ inches held to be de minimis
• 1 7/8 height differential in sidewalk non- actionable as a matter of law
• l7/s-inch height differential in sidewalk nonactionable as a matter of law
• height differential of 1 ⅞ inches was de minimis
• 1f-inch elevation between two concrete slabs not actionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).