Gren v. Gren

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “factual issues ... including the timeliness in initiating the arbitration proceeding, belonged to the arbitrator”
• “Timeliness of a demand for arbitration is a fact question reserved for an arbitrator, not the trial judge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• John Cox v. Village of Tequesta
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-03· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Seifert v. US Home Corp.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-11-18· cited 377×
• Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc. v. Bloom
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-15· cited 49×
• MEBA Medical & Benefits Plan v. Lago
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-03· cited 30×
• North American Van Lines v. Collyer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-04-02· cited 26×
• Public Health Trust of Dade County v. M.R. Harrison Construction Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-18· cited 21×
• Alderman v. City of Jacksonville
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-31· cited 11×
• Thenet v. Jenne
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-05· cited 4×
• Equity Premium Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-30· cited 3×