District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/2/1993
North American Van Lines v. Collyer
Citations
- 616 So. 2d 177
- 1993 WL 95495
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “a party who, by his own acts, prevents performance of a contract provision cannot take advantage of his own wrong”
- requiring plaintiffs to pay the initial arbitration filing fees even though the defendant asked the circuit court to stay the legal proceedings and insisted on exercising its contractual arbitration rights
- “[A] party who, by his own acts, prevents performance of a contract provision cannot take advantage of his own wrong.”
- “A court is not empowered to rewrite a clear and unambiguous provision, nor should it attempt to make an otherwise valid contract more reasonable for one of the parties.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rollins, Inc. v. FosterM.D. Alabama· 1998-01-20· cited 28×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. CurranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-12-02· cited 21×
- Beverly Hills v. George Wimpey of Fla., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-27· cited 20×
- Burger King Corporation v. Hinton, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2002-05-07· cited 17×
- Morrell v. Wayne Frier Manufactured Home CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-17· cited 16×
- Three Keys, Ltd. v. Kennedy Funding, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-11-20· cited 10×
- Amoco Oil Co. v. GomezS.D. Florida· 2000-12-19· cited 10×
- Bill Heard Chevrolet Corp. v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-05-07· cited 9×
- Stinson-Head, Inc. v. City of SanibelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-04· cited 8×
- KFC NAT. MANAGEMENT CO. v. BeauregardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-25· cited 8×
- Zephyr Haven Health & Rehab Center, Inc. v. Hardin ex rel. HardinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-09-27· cited 8×
- Duckworth v. PlantDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-25· cited 4×
- Coastal Fuels Marketing v. Leasco InvDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-10-06· cited 3×
- Continental Florida Materials Inc. v. KushermanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-25· cited 3×
- Magnum Construction Management Corp., Etc. v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-14· cited 2×
- Gren v. GrenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-08· cited 2×
- Head v. SorensenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-06-16
- Simon v. SimonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-20
- Hamm v. EcklerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-02-27
- Prospec, L.L.C. v. MazzeiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-05
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-10-13· cited 91×
- Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc. v. BloomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-07-15· cited 49×
- Medical Center Health Plan v. BrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-12-14· cited 24×
- Piercy v. SCHOOL BD. OF WASH. CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-11· cited 19×
- Bumby & Stimpson, Inc. v. Peninsula Utilities Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-12-08· cited 14×
- AP Brown Co. v. Superior Court, County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1971-11-24· cited 13×
- City of Tampa v. City of Port TampaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1961-02-24· cited 12×
- Larry Kent Homes v. Empire of America FSADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-15· cited 11×
- Kessel v. DugandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.