Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 11/24/1969
Greenway v. State
Citations
- 259 A.2d 89
- 8 Md. App. 194
- 1969 Md. App. LEXIS 272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a defendant’s knowledge or criminal conduct may be inferred from circumstantial evidence
- holding that a defendant’s knowledge or criminal conduct may be inferred from circumstantial evidence
- a person may be found to have knowledge when the person deliberately shuts his/her eyes to avoid knowing what would otherwise be obvious to view
- a person may be found to have knowledge when the person deliberately shuts his/her eyes to avoid knowing what would otherwise be obvious to view
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Anderson, Morton, Orth, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McCallumCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-01-02· cited 61×
- United States v. Frank SquiresSecond Circuit· 1971-03-25· cited 56×
- State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. HolscherNebraska Supreme Court· 1975-05-15· cited 41×
- Woodruff v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1971-02-09· cited 15×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-01-13· cited 13×
- State v. HondaCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1980-07-02· cited 5×
- Clarke v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1970-06-24· cited 2×
- Untitled Texas Attorney General OpinionTexas Attorney General Reports· 1972-07-02
- Hayden v. Md. Dept. of Natural ResourcesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-09-03
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.