Greenberg v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that new notice unnecessary when new defendant was added
• noting that “neither case law nor the provisions of the PSLRA require a second notice to be published when the complaint was amended to add [an] additional defendant”
• \[N]either case law nor the provisions of the PSLRA require a second notice to be published when the complaint was amended to add [an] additional defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cheney v. CyberGuard Corp.
  S.D. Florida· 2003-03-07· cited 58×
• In re Fuwei Films Securities Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2008-01-24· cited 54×
• Rauch v. Vale S.A.
  E.D. New York· 2019-05-13· cited 29×
• In re Lucent Technologies, Inc., Securities Litigation
  D. New Jersey· 2000-04-26· cited 29×
• In Re Cyberonics Inc. Securities Litigation
  S.D. Texas· 2006-11-28· cited 6×
• In Re Thornburg Mortgage, Inc. Securities Litigation
  D. New Mexico· 2009-03-17· cited 3×
• In re Houston American Energy Corp. Securities Litigation
  S.D. Texas· 2013-08-22· cited 1×
• Cheney v. Cyberguard Corp.
  S.D. Florida· 2002-08-14· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 2,470×
• In Re Olsten Corp. Securities Litig.
  E.D. New York· 1998-05-04· cited 132×
• Maharaj v. Bankamerica Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 105×
• Gluck v. CellStar Corp.
  N.D. Texas· 1997-08-19· cited 67×
• American Renaissance Lines, Inc. v. Saxis Steamship Co., and Multifacs International Traders, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1974-08-05· cited 43×
• Katz v. Financial Clearing & Services Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1992-04-30· cited 20×
• Metro Services Inc. v. Wiggins
  Second Circuit· 1998-10-15· cited 9×