California Supreme Court· 1/26/1976

Greenbaum v. State Bar

Citations

544 P.2d 921
15 Cal. 3d 893
126 Cal. Rptr. 785
1976 Cal. LEXIS 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

fact that client was not and would not be harmed by attorney's action was irrelevant
fact that client was not and would not be harmed by attorney’s action was irrelevant
“when findings rest primarily on testimonial evidence, the decision of the local committee, which was in a better position to evaluate conflicting statements after observing the demeanor of the witnesses and the character of their testimony, must be given great weight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.