Greenbaum v. State Bar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fact that client was not and would not be harmed by attorney's action was irrelevant
• fact that client was not and would not be harmed by attorney’s action was irrelevant
• “when findings rest primarily on testimonial evidence, the decision of the local committee, which was in a better position to evaluate conflicting statements after observing the demeanor of the witnesses and the character of their testimony, must be given great weight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).