Sixth Circuit· 11/19/1999

Green v. Nevers

Citations

196 F.3d 627
1999 WL 1044239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that denial of a motion seeking discovery of an attorney retainer/fee agreement was proper as it was “irrelevant,” even though the gravamen of the case was the reasonableness of those attorney fees
“Rulings concerning the scope of discovery are generally reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
pending discovery dispute mooted by disposition of underlying cause of action
“[U]nder federal law, in the absence of explicit statutory direction on the issue, the award of prejudgment interest is . . . in the discretion of the court.”
“[U]nder federal law, in the absence of explicit statutory direction on the issue, the award of prejudgment interest is . . . in the discretion of the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibson, Moore, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.