D. Massachusetts· 2/11/2016
Green v. Cosby
Citations
- 160 F. Supp. 3d 431
- 93 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1507
- 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17044
- 2016 WL 554816
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to quash a deposition subpoena directed to the defendant’s wife who, with her unique role in the defendant’s life, might possess a good deal of relevant, non-privileged material
- seeking to avoid disclosure of marital communications and embarrassment associated with questions regarding infidelity
- “The balancing of any burden imposed upon Deponent against Plaintiffs’ need for information is the type of fact-based discovery determination which is particularly suited for deference to a magistrate judge.”
- first quoting Phinney v. Wentworth Douglas Hosp., 199 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 1999) (quoting Cumpiano v. Banco Santander P.R., 902 F.2d 148, 152 (1st Cir. 1990)); then quoting PowerShare, Inc. v. Syntel, Inc., 597 F.3d 10, 15 (1st Cir. 2010
- first quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); and then quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (“The district judge in the case must consider timely objections and modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.”)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mastroianni
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Green v. CosbyD. Massachusetts· 2016-04-04· cited 10×
- Painters & Allied Trades Dist. Council 82 Health Care Fund v. Forest Labs., Inc. (In re Celexa & Lexapro Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.)District of Columbia· 2018-01-24· cited 4×
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Braintree Laboratories, Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2016-02-29· cited 1×
- Kiossovski v. Forest Labs., Inc. (In re Celexa & Lexapro Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.)District of Columbia· 2018-01-02
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 1,217×
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-12-11· cited 406×
- Wilma Cumpiano A/K/A Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto RicoFirst Circuit· 1990-05-04· cited 396×
- Phinney v. Wentworth Douglas HospitalFirst Circuit· 1999-12-08· cited 294×
- Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1958-11-24· cited 277×
- Powershare, Inc. v. Syntel, Inc.First Circuit· 2010-03-01· cited 182×
- Demoulas v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-12-22· cited 95×
- Commonwealth v. GalvinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-03-04· cited 87×
- Harbor Houses Condominium Ass'n v. IDC Clambakes, Inc.First Circuit· 2013-08-14· cited 45×
- Vazquez-Rijos v. AnhangFirst Circuit· 2011-08-17· cited 43×
- Green v. CosbyD. Massachusetts· 2015-12-31· cited 36×
- Ameristar Jet Charter, Inc. v. Signal Composites, Inc.First Circuit· 2001-04-03· cited 24×
- Gallagher v. GoldsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1988-06-07· cited 19×
- Boston Seaman's Friend Society, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1980-01-07· cited 18×
- In re a Grand Jury SubpoenaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2006-06-22· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. HayesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1887-11-23· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. SugrueMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1993-02-25· cited 14×
- Gargiulo v. Baystate Health Inc.D. Massachusetts· 2012-01-04· cited 12×
- Commonwealth v. GillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1970-10-29· cited 11×
- United States v. ByardU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1989-11-17· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.