California Court of Appeal· 7/27/2010
GREAT LAKES CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. Burman
Citations
- 186 Cal. App. 4th 1347
- 114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Generally, before the disqualification of an attorney is proper, the complaining party must have or must have had an attorney-client relationship with that attorney.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kennedy v. EldridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-12-13· cited 89×
- Blue Water Sunset, LLC v. MarkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-02-02· cited 23×
- Urs Corp. v. VentureCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-09-26· cited 20×
- Coldren v. Hart, King & Coldren, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2015-08-05· cited 18×
- Jarvis v. JarvisCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-03-19· cited 17×
- Havasu Lakeshore Investments, LLC v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-06-19· cited 15×
- Murchison v. MurchisonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-03-17· cited 14×
- People v. Lee C. (In re Estate of Lee C.)California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-12-29· cited 12×
- San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. Shauna R. (In re Cody R.)California Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-12-17· cited 12×
- Liapis v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court· 2012-08-09· cited 12×
- Lynn v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-09-21· cited 9×
- Tapia v. City of AlbuquerqueD. New Mexico· 2014-03-31· cited 8×
- Burnett v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-04-16· cited 6×
- Havasu Lakeshore v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-07-01
- Virginia E. Burnett v. State of Washington, Dept. of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-04-16
- Lynn v. GeorgeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-09-21
- URS Corp. v. Atkinson/Walsh Joint VentureCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2017-09-26
- Conservatorship of Lee C.California Court of Appeal· 2017-12-29
- In re Cody R.California Court of Appeal· 2018-12-17
- In re Cody R.California Court of Appeal· 2019-01-07
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People Ex Rel. Deparment of Corporations. v. Speedee Oil Change Systems, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1999-07-27· cited 360×
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-28· cited 248×
- Angelucci v. Century Supper ClubCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-05-31· cited 145×
- Crawford v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.California Supreme Court· 2008-07-21· cited 92×
- DCH Health Services Corp. v. WaiteCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-01-28· cited 55×
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-05-21· cited 53×
- Colyer v. SmithC.D. California· 1999-05-25· cited 50×
- Smith, Smith & Kring v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Court of Appeal· 1997-12-30· cited 49×
- Henriksen v. Great American Savings & LoanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-11-25· cited 49×
- Zador Corp. v. KwanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-01-30· cited 43×
- IBM Personal Pension Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-08-15· cited 40×
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-07-24· cited 28×
- Dino v. PELAYOCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-11-30· cited 24×
- Hetos Investments, Ltd. v. KurtinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-06-30· cited 23×
- Strasbourger Pearson Tulcin Wolff Inc. v. Wiz Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1999-02-16· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.