· 12/30/1997
Smith, Smith & Kring v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.
Citations
- 60 Cal. App. 4th 573
- 60 Cal. App. 2d 573
- 70 Cal. Rptr. 2d 507
- 97 Daily Journal DAR 13
- 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9774
- 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 1102
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering the “strong interest parties have in representation by counsel of their choice 13 and in avoiding the duplicate expense and time-consuming effort involved in replacing counsel”
- absent eviden-tiary support, court on motion to disqualify should disregard factual contentions made in moving papers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rylaarsdam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.