Skip to main content
· 12/30/1997

Smith, Smith & Kring v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.

Citations

  • 60 Cal. App. 4th 573
  • 60 Cal. App. 2d 573
  • 70 Cal. Rptr. 2d 507
  • 97 Daily Journal DAR 13
  • 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9774
  • 1997 Cal. App. LEXIS 1102

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the “strong interest parties have in representation by counsel of their choice 13 and in avoiding the duplicate expense and time-consuming effort involved in replacing counsel”
  • absent eviden-tiary support, court on motion to disqualify should disregard factual contentions made in moving papers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rylaarsdam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.