Skip to main content

Grayson v. State

Citations

  • 728 A.2d 1280
  • 354 Md. 1
  • 1999 Md. LEXIS 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 12-202 does not bar jurisdiction where the Court of Special Appeals decisions “were not simply discretionary determinations that there should be no appeals.”
  • holding that 12-202 does not bar jurisdiction where the Court of Special Appeals decisions \were not simply discretionary determinations that there should be no appeals.\
  • holding that this Court had jurisdiction to review the Court of Special Appeals’ denial of applications for leave to appeal where the Court of Special Appeals’ held two postconviction petitions were not allowable as a matter of law
  • applying Art. 1 § 36 to conclude that a post-conviction petition was timely filed under the Post Conviction Procedure Act, then Art. 27 § 645A
  • discussing this Court’s authority to exercise discretion to grant an application for leave to appeal from the denial of post-conviction relief
  • in a case decided by the Court of Special Appeals, ordinarily the issues before this Court are those set forth in the certiorari petition, not the briefs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Eldridge, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.