Gray v. Southern Facilities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant failed to prove that the stigma damages to his real property were attributable to the single act of the named defendant and therefore does not decide whether we will allow recovery for this type of property damage
• holding that appellant failed to prove that the stigma damages to his real property were attributable to the single act of the named defendant and therefore does not decide whether we will allow recovery for this type of property damage
• holding damage for permanent injury to real property caused by pollution of a stream is diminution in the market value of the property
• rejecting as \speculative\ evidence that a completed tort had injured the \reputation\ of the land
• damage for permanent injury to property caused by pollution of a stream is diminution in the market value of the property
• it is basic that a negligent act is not itself actionable and only becomes such when it results in damages to another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).