Gray v. Laws

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the district court erred by “appltying] in the Eleventh Amendment context principles applicable only under section 1983”
• remanding when the district court did not “undertake the appropriate Eleventh Amendment analysis”
• “The Constitution’s due process requirements are defined by the Constitution and do not vary from state to state on the happenstance of a particular state’s procedural rules.”
• “In the end, we do not believe that Hess, as it applies to single state entities, materially altered the Eleventh Amendment analysis we formulated in Ram Ditta . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).