Seventh Circuit· 4/8/2015
Grasty v. Colorado Technical University
Citations
- 599 F. App'x 596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “[m]otions 5 to compel arbitration ... are brought properly under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 12(b)(3)”
- “[A]n agreement to arbitrate does not affect a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. An arbitration clause is a type of forum-selection clause.”
- “[A]n agreement to arbitrate does not affect a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. An arbitration clause is a type of forum-selection clause.”
- “[A]n agreement to arbitrate does not affect a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. An arbitration clause is a type of forum-selection clause.”
- “[W]e must enforce the parties’ agreement to arbitrate ‘gateway’ questions about arbitrability of claims and the scope of the arbitration agreement.” (citation omitted)
- “[A]n agreement to arbitrate does not affect a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. An arbitration clause is a type of forum-selection clause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Hamilton, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.