Seventh Circuit· 4/8/2015
Grasty v. Colorado Technical University
Citations
- 599 F. App'x 596
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “[m]otions 5 to compel arbitration ... are brought properly under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6 12(b)(3)”
- “[A]n agreement to arbitrate does not affect a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. An arbitration clause is a type of forum-selection clause.”
- “[A]n agreement to arbitrate does not affect a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. An arbitration clause is a type of forum-selection clause.”
- “[A]n agreement to arbitrate does not affect a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. An arbitration clause is a type of forum-selection clause.”
- “[W]e must enforce the parties’ agreement to arbitrate ‘gateway’ questions about arbitrability of claims and the scope of the arbitration agreement.” (citation omitted)
- “[A]n agreement to arbitrate does not affect a district court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. An arbitration clause is a type of forum-selection clause.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Hamilton, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Big City Small World Bakery Café, LLC v. Francis David Corp.E.D. Michigan· 2017-07-11· cited 27×
- Mohammed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2017-02-14· cited 24×
- Boyd v. CookNebraska Supreme Court· 2018-02-02· cited 23×
- United States v. International Fidelity Insurance Co.S.D. Alabama· 2017-02-07· cited 5×
- Purvi Gandi-Kapoor v. Hone Capital LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2023-11-22
- Purvi Gandi-Kapoor v. Hone Capital LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2023-12-04
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 3,702×
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court· 2013-02-27· cited 1,424×
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 1,312×
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court· 2010-06-21· cited 909×
- Steinberg v. Chicago Medical SchoolIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-12-12· cited 481×
- Aggarao v. MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.Fourth Circuit· 2012-03-16· cited 273×
- Deborah Jackson v. Payday Financial, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2014-08-22· cited 174×
- Faulkenberg v. CB Tax Franchise Systems, LPSeventh Circuit· 2011-03-29· cited 172×
- Frank H. Boomer, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. At & T Corporation, a New York CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2002-10-03· cited 155×
- Automobile Mechanics Local 701 Welfare & Pension Funds v. Vanguard Car Rental USA, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2007-09-18· cited 113×
- Carter v. SSC Odin Operating CompanyIllinois Supreme Court· 2012-09-20· cited 111×
- Scott's S&S Incorporated v. Steak N Shake Enterprises, IncSeventh Circuit· 2014-08-29· cited 66×
- Mark F. Bailey v. ERG Enterprises, LPEleventh Circuit· 2013-01-25· cited 35×
- Johnson v. Lincoln Christian CollegeAppellate Court of Illinois· 1986-12-16· cited 29×
- Sherwood v. MARQUETTE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2009-11-23· cited 28×
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSeventh Circuit· 2013-10-08· cited 9×
- Yukiyo, Ltd. v. WatanabeFederal Circuit· 1997-04-15· cited 6×
- Shapiro v. ACCUSupreme Court· 2018-02-26· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.