Grant v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• age and vulnerability, in light of psychological trauma and breach of trust by defendant, justified departure
• fear and emotional trauma, even though inherent components of the crime of robbery, held a proper basis for upward departure because victim's trauma was greater than that usually associated with a single robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wemett v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-08-30· cited 46×
• Abt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-07-13· cited 11×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-15· cited 8×
• Semenec v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-09-03· cited 5×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Albritton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-08-29· cited 397×
• State v. Mischler
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-03· cited 241×
• Casteel v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-11· cited 87×
• Hankey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-04-03· cited 52×
• Mischler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-17· cited 41×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-17· cited 40×
• Manning v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-21· cited 34×
• Steiner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-21· cited 33×
• Knowlton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-02-20· cited 30×
• State v. Davis
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1985-10-17· cited 16×
• Harris v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-05· cited 16×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-13· cited 15×
• Campos v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-05-28· cited 8×