Hankey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant failed to satisfy first prong of Strickland test because record showed trial counsel used inadmissible outcry testimony to discredit the complainant's testimony
• holding that appellant failed to satisfy first prong of Strickland, test because record showed trial counsel used inadmissible outcry testimony to discredit the complainant’s testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).