Skip to main content

Grand v. Nacchio

Citations

  • 236 P.3d 398
  • 225 Ariz. 171
  • 588 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 30
  • 2010 Ariz. LEXIS 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “participation” requires active involvement with a stake in the outcome, not merely an ancillary role in the stock sale
  • finding no abuse of discretion in denying motion to amend given “the long history” of the case and the party’s “considered decision to abandon” a claim
  • “We ordinarily do not construe statutes so as to render portions of them superfluous.” (citation omitted)
  • “In evaluating motions to dismiss, Arizona courts consider only the ‘well-pled facts,’ not legal conclusions.”
  • “We ordinarily do not construe statutes so as to render portions of them superfluous.”
  • “We ordinarily do not construe statutes so as to render portions of them superfluous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurwitz, Berch, Ryan, Pelander, Swann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.