Arizona Supreme Court· 8/5/2010
Grand v. Nacchio
Citations
- 236 P.3d 398
- 225 Ariz. 171
- 588 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 30
- 2010 Ariz. LEXIS 35
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “participation” requires active involvement with a stake in the outcome, not merely an ancillary role in the stock sale
- finding no abuse of discretion in denying motion to amend given “the long history” of the case and the party’s “considered decision to abandon” a claim
- “We ordinarily do not construe statutes so as to render portions of them superfluous.” (citation omitted)
- “In evaluating motions to dismiss, Arizona courts consider only the ‘well-pled facts,’ not legal conclusions.”
- “We ordinarily do not construe statutes so as to render portions of them superfluous.”
- “We ordinarily do not construe statutes so as to render portions of them superfluous.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurwitz, Berch, Ryan, Pelander, Swann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- James C. Sell v. Hon. gama/squire & CompanyArizona Supreme Court· 2013-02-22· cited 39×
- Al Carranza v. madrigal/investigation Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court· 2015-07-22· cited 26×
- Pawn 1st, LLC v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-01-31· cited 15×
- Estate of Desela v. Prescott Unified School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court· 2011-01-18· cited 14×
- Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-06-25· cited 12×
- Scenic Arizona v. City of Phoenix Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-02-09· cited 7×
- In re Allstate Life InsuranceD. Arizona· 2013-09-13· cited 7×
- Facciola v. Greenberg Traurig, LLPD. Arizona· 2011-03-31· cited 4×
- Microchip Technology Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-05-31· cited 4×
- City of Apache Junction v. DoolittleCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-03-17· cited 1×
- Estate of Maddison Desela v. Prescott UnifiedArizona Supreme Court· 2011-01-18
- State of Arizona v. Ricky GrayCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2011-06-20
- Bates v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2021-05-11
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,261×
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,685×
- Cullen v. Auto-Owners InsuranceArizona Supreme Court· 2008-07-25· cited 204×
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-01-13· cited 130×
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court· 1983-10-18· cited 79×
- Williams v. ThudeArizona Supreme Court· 1997-04-03· cited 62×
- Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-11-24· cited 59×
- State v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 43×
- State v. GunnisonArizona Supreme Court· 1980-09-22· cited 36×
- Champlin v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court· 1998-09-24· cited 31×
- Wojtunik v. KealyD. Arizona· 2005-09-26· cited 19×
- Trump v. BadetArizona Supreme Court· 1958-07-15· cited 18×
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TarantinoArizona Supreme Court· 1977-02-28· cited 14×
- Strom v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1974-07-05· cited 10×
- Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-09-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.