State v. Superior Court of Maricopa County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a communication is compelled when “when an individual is forced to make [a] ... communicative act”
• attorney not compelled to produce privileged evidence belonging to client in attorney’s possession, when requested by subpoena served on attorney
• attorney not compelled to produce privileged evidence belonging to client in attorney's possession, when requested by subpoena served on attorney
• attorney not required to produce subpoenaed document only if “the document was transferred to the attorney to further his legal advice and if the client himself would be privileged from producing the document”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).