Skip to main content

Graham v. State

Citations

  • 251 A.2d 616
  • 6 Md. App. 458
  • 1969 Md. App. LEXIS 443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in which two months was “recent” where the possession was not satisfactorily explained
  • “The law is clear that the recent, exclusive possession of stolen goods creates an inference of fact that the possessor was the thief or the burglar and casts upon him the burden to give a reasonable explanation of how he came into such possession[.]”
  • two months sufficient for theft of a television

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: The Cause Was Submitted to Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.