Skip to main content
· 4/3/2009

Graham v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 608 F. Supp. 2d 50
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49156
  • 2009 WL 902302

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “plaintiffs must specifically explain what their proposed discovery would likely reveal and why that revelation would advance the plaintiffs’ case”
  • noting that “plaintiffs must specifically explain what their proposed discovery would likely reveal and why that revelation would advance the plaintiffs’ case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Richard W. Roberts

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.