United States v. Calderon-Segura

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court properly denied a motion to dismiss an indictment because the prior removal was not “fundamentally unfair” under § 1326(d)(3)
• holding a “rational basis exists for granting the Attorney General discretion to place some non-[lawful permanent resident] aggravated felons into expedited removal proceedings and others into potentially more lenient general removal proceedings”
• “[F]ingerprint identification methods have been tested in the adversarial system for roughly a hundred years.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).