Graham R. v. Jane S.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e will reverse an evidentiary ruling only if [the] error prejudicially affected a party’s substantial rights.” (second alteration in original) (quoting Lum v. Koles, 314 P.3d 546, 552 (Alaska 2013))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).