Skip to main content

Grace v. Grace

Citations

  • 655 N.W.2d 595
  • 253 Mich. App. 357

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a party receives a double recovery if it is compensated twice for “any injury identical with another in nature, time, and place.”
  • holding that the focus was on whether the wrongful conduct of one party caused the other party to incur the legal fees
  • the focus is on whether the wrongful conduct of one party caused the other party to incur the legal fees
  • “The law of the case doctrine is discretionary and expresses the practice of the courts generally; it is not a limit on their power.”
  • “The law of the case doctrine is discretionary and expresses the practice of the courts generally; it is not a limit on their power.”
  • in order to constitute a double recovery, the injury to be compensated must be identical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neff, Jansen, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.