Chicilo v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because “the damage awards received in both the federal court action and the state court action compensate the same injuries,” “plaintiff has recovered twice for the same injuries” (emphasis added)
• “In making such a determination [about whether a double recovery occurred], the nature of the conduct causing the injury and the label attached to the plaintiff's claims are of little relevance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).