Gottschalk v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• fondling conviction re versed because thirteen year old victim’s testimony was uncorroborated
• fondling conviction reversed because thirteen year old victim's testimony was uncorroborated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Blake v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-06-24· cited 372×
• Easter v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-04-28· cited 125×
• McDonald v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-10· cited 108×
• Carnathan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-08· cited 22×
• Prine v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-05-29· cited 20×
• Guevara v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-12-16· cited 12×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-04-14· cited 5×
• Gregory v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-11-18· cited 4×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-14· cited 4×
• Huggins v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-05-27· cited 3×
• James George Guevara v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2009-01-28
• Jimenez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1968-07-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pipkin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1950-05-24· cited 11×
• Hinson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1948-06-02· cited 10×
• Gallager v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1936-11-04· cited 9×
• State v. Wilkins
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1909-06-08· cited 8×
• Welch v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1949-02-23· cited 7×
• Dodson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1887-12-17· cited 3×